Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPartners for Health Reformplus (PHR)
dc.date.accessioned2020-07-02T13:32:38Z
dc.date.available2020-07-02T13:32:38Z
dc.date.issued2003-01
dc.identifier.urihttp://dspace.ceid.org.tr/xmlui/handle/1/596
dc.description.abstractImproved accountability is often called for as an element in improving health system performance. At first glance, the notion of better accountability seems straightforward, but it contains a high degree of complexity. For accountability to serve effectively as an organizing principle for health systems reform, conceptual and analytical clarity is required. This paper elaborates a definition of accountability in terms of answerability and sanctions, and distinguishes three types of accountability: financial, performance, and political/democratic. The role of health sector actors in accountability is reviewed. An accountability-mapping tool is proposed that identifies linkages among health sector actors and assesses capacity to demand and supply information. The paper describes three accountability-enhancing strategies: reducing abuse, assuring compliance with procedures and standards, and improving performance/learning. Using an accountability lens can: a) help to generate a system-wide perspective on health sector reform, and b) identify connections among individual improvement interventions. These results can support synergistic outcomes, enhance system performance, and contribute to sustainability.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPartners for Health Reformplusen_US
dc.subjectSağlık hizmetlerien_US
dc.subjectHealth Serviceen_US
dc.titleAccountability and Health Systems: Overview, Framework, and Strategiesen_US
dc.typeDiger Kuruluslara Ait Raporlaren_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record